Re: [xml] RE: xml digest, Vol 1 #619 - 4 msgs

[Robert Collins <robert collins syncretize net>]

On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 21:03, Igor Zlatkovic wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Ho, where do you get those subjects?
>
> > I agree that "LIBXML_PUBLIC" would be a much clearer and more descriptive
> > term than "LIBXML_DLL_IMPORT".
> >
> > As a Windows developer, I would vote for including this in all the
> > declarations, but I realize that others will probably disagree. Are there
> no
> > platforms other than Windows where it would be useful to mark "public"
> > functions and data in this way?
>
> Other platforms with this mess? I doubt it. At least libxml source defines
> this macro only on Windows.

IIRC AIX Also uses .dll's and has the same export issue. I am likely
wrong though - YMMV.

Rob