Re: [xml] RE: xml digest, Vol 1 #619 - 4 msgs

[Igor Zlatkovic <igor stud fh-frankfurt de>]

> Hi,

Ho, where do you get those subjects?

> I agree that "LIBXML_PUBLIC" would be a much clearer and more descriptive
> term than "LIBXML_DLL_IMPORT".
>
> As a Windows developer, I would vote for including this in all the
> declarations, but I realize that others will probably disagree. Are there
no
> platforms other than Windows where it would be useful to mark "public"
> functions and data in this way?

Other platforms with this mess? I doubt it. At least libxml source defines
this macro only on Windows.

Ciao
Igor