FW : [xml] FW : Bug libxslt
- From: "Thomas Broyer" <tbroyer ltgt net>
- To: "LibXSLT" <xslt gnome org>, "LibXML" <xml gnome org>
- Subject: FW : [xml] FW : Bug libxslt
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 21:58:47 -0000
I forward this mail once again as the bugs have not been resolved in the
last release.
-----Original Message-----
From: Alain Ketterlin [mailto:alain dpt-info u-strasbg fr]
Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2002 2:33 PM
To: Thomas Broyer
Subject: Re: Bug libxslt
Hi all,
I've just tried libxml and libxslt, and _really_ enjoyed. However, I've
found two bugs. Here they are:
1. The following stylesheet, applied to any document with xsltproc,
produces malformed output (a literal &):
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
version="1.0">
<xsl:template match="/">
<top><![CDATA[&]]></top>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
2. The following document gets a validity error from xmllint:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE top [
<!ELEMENT top (#PCDATA|z|lp:z)*>
<!ELEMENT z (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT lp:z (#PCDATA)>
]>
<top/>
libxml seems to consider that z and lp:z are the same, which they are
not according to DTD's syntax. (That's the kind of silly things you have
to do when you want to DTD-validate documents using namespaces, at least
in certain circumstances.)
I'm using (from xsltproc):
Using libxml 20424, libxslt 10020 and libexslt 711
xsltproc was compiled against libxml 20424, libxslt 10020 and libexslt
711 libxslt 10020 was compiled against libxml 20424 libexslt 711 was
compiled against libxml 20424
Anyway, keep up the excellent work. Cheers,
-- Alain.
_______________________________________________
xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ xml gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]