Re: [xml] help required in libxml parser

[Fco . Mario Barcala Rodríguez <barcala dc fi udc es>]

On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 08:38:42AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 02:21:08PM +0200, Igor Zlatkovic wrote:
> > To the mailing list members: You guys think this is apropriate?

I agree with you, i think this kind of disclaimer has not to be sended to a
list like this.

> > More and more companies are enforcing disclaimers such as this one on all
> > outgoing mail and it is just the question of time until some moron really
> > posts confidential info and possibly causes damage to her company. In order
> > to avoid any possibility of legal dispute, I would suggest that a warning
> > similar to the above be put on the xmlsoft.org website. Me and others who
> > link to that mailing list should explicitly state that the rules must be
> > read and agreed to before posting anything. What do you think?
>
>   That may be a bit hard to enforce, I would rather avoid post support for
> docs, but a warning in the generated "bugs.html" pages should be an easy first
> step.

My contribution to this list is as newbie user of the library (up to
date), so i don't know which is the best way to do this. I think Daniel or
Igor will know more about it :), but i think that it could be useful to put
a warning of this kind on some place to avoid these habits.

  Mario