Re: [xml] help required in libxml parser

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 02:21:08PM +0200, Igor Zlatkovic wrote:
> To the mailing list members: You guys think this is apropriate?

  yeah, I got furious the other day too.

> More and more companies are enforcing disclaimers such as this one on all
> outgoing mail and it is just the question of time until some moron really
> posts confidential info and possibly causes damage to her company. In order
> to avoid any possibility of legal dispute, I would suggest that a warning
> similar to the above be put on the xmlsoft.org website. Me and others who
> link to that mailing list should explicitly state that the rules must be
> read and agreed to before posting anything. What do you think?

  That may be a bit hard to enforce, I would rather avoid post support for
docs, but a warning in the generated "bugs.html" pages should be an easy first
step.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/