Re: [xml] License confusion
- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- To: uttam rao <auttamrao hotmail com>
- Cc: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] License confusion
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:40:17 -0400
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 12:18:28PM +0000, uttam rao wrote:
Hello sir,
I want to use libxml in one of our commercial product.
I saw on the website that it released under 'MIT' license which allows me to
use it inside my commercial product without publishing my source codes. But
in the downloaded package of libxml in file 'copying' there is a description
of 'GNU LIBRARY GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE' so which one is the right one.
In short does it force me to publish my software freely if I use libxml?
Recent libxml2 release are under the MIT licence. Older ones
were under the LGPL (or W3C IPR).
Use a recent one.
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard redhat com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
