Re: [xml] Small BSDI 4.x compatibility fix nanohttp.c

[Melvyn Sopacua <mdev idg nl>]

At 12:03 3/27/2002 -0500, you wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 05:46:57PM +0100, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > hereby a patch for nanohttp.c (and related config) against release 2.4.19.
> >
> > The struct ns_tsig_key is defined in arpa/nameser.h on bsdi 4.x.
> >
> > I've made the fix 'generic' as I don't know if other platforms might have
> > the same problems.
>
>   Isn't the already commited patch sufficient ?
>
>
> http://cvs.gnome.org/bonsai/cvsquery.cgi?module=gnome-xml&branch=HEAD&branchtype=match&dir=gnome-xml&file=&filetype=match&who=veillard&whotype=match&sortby=Date&hours=&date=explicit&mindate=03%2F26%2F02+02%3A57&maxdate=03%2F26%2F02+02%3A59&cvsroot=%2Fcvs%2Fgnome

Yes.
It's sufficient for BSDi.

>   I'm not too found of #if defined(ns_tsig_key), I dunno why...

Understandable - just was thinking about that odd condition, where 
nameser.h gives
problems and ns_tsig_key is somewhere else :-)




Best regards,

Melvyn Sopacua
WebMaster IDG.nl
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
If it applies, where it applies - this email is a personal
contribution and does not reflect the views of my employer
IDG.nl.
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\