would it also be a big change to add "_private" at the end of the struct
?
less significant, that could be done.
ok so the patch is attached Btw. what do you think about adding also "ownerElement" pointer to xmlNs ? Again, this would help implementing the node wrapper. If you are interrested, I can prepare patches for this. Petr (oops wrong button pressed and no file attached a while ago)
Attachment:
xmlNs_private.patch
Description: Binary data