Re: [xml] adding "void *private" member to the struct xmlNs

[Aleksey Sanin <aleksey aleksey com>]

Yes, you are right. Replace "private" with "priv" everywhere in my previous
message :)

Aleksey

Igor Zlatkovic wrote:
> Ho there,
>
> In order to prevent a myriad of problems which would certainly come,
> please try to avoid using C++ keywords when naming variables :-)
>
> Ciao
> Igor
>
> > Hi, Daniel!
> >
> > This question was discussed some time ago but I could not understand
> > do we have any agreement or not. And  I would like to raise it again
> > because it looks like I need this functionality too :)
> > So the question is: can we add "void* private" member to the 
> > "struct xmlNs"?
> > This pointer will be used by application to store application 
> > specific data
> > and LibXML will simply always ignore it.
> > There were two suggestions:
> >     1) make struct xmlNs  similar to structures for other 
> > node types and put
> >     "void * private" on the second place (adv.: simplicity 
> > and following
> >     standard; dis. : this breaks binary compatibility)
> >     2) add "void* private" to the end of struct xmlNs (adv.: binary 
> > compatible;
> >     dis.: "special case" for applications)
> > As far as I can understand, we could not go with option 1) because of 
> > binary
> > compatibility. I would like to find out, can the implement option 2) 
> >  (it's ugly
> > but it gives me what I want :) ).
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Aleksey
> >   
>  
> _______________________________________________
> xml mailing list, project page  http://xmlsoft.org/
> xml gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml