Re: extended WM_TRANSIENT_FOR (was Re: _NET: Disabling shading)
- From: Bill Haneman <Bill Haneman Sun COM>
- To: Rob Adams <readams readams net>
- Cc: wm-spec-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: extended WM_TRANSIENT_FOR (was Re: _NET: Disabling shading)
- Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 17:29:09 +0100
On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 17:18, Rob Adams wrote:
> KWin marks the window with the _NEEDS_ATTENTION hint when it is
> prevented from stealing focus. Assistive technologies could pick up on
> this hint.
ATs do not (and should not, IMO) listen directly to WM hints. If
additional API is needed it would have to go into the GNOME accessibilty
infrastructure. However I don't see a good justification for this in
the current case.
- Bill
>
> On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 05:58, Bill Haneman wrote:
>
> > I certainly hope this feature is optional. I can foresee accessibility
> > problems with it; at this time assistive technologies use
> > window-activation as their means of knowing that something needs or is
> > trying to get the user's attention, for instance warning dialogs, etc.
> > Windows that aren't activated are generally ignored.
> >
> > A sighted user can 'see' that a new window has been posted, or has been
> > raised, etc. and that its content has changed, but blind users must rely
> > on the AT and WM for that. We have enshrined the 'focus on create'
> > policy and also the notion that alerts, etc. must steal focus in order
> > to be heard.
> >
> > - Bill
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > wm-spec-list mailing list
> > wm-spec-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/wm-spec-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> wm-spec-list mailing list
> wm-spec-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/wm-spec-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]