Re: Proposal for ConfigureRequest handling
- From: "Matthias Clasen" <Matthias Clasen poet de>
- To: dominik vogt fvwm org
- Cc: wm-spec <wm-spec-list gnome org>, wm-spec-list-admin gnome org
- Subject: Re: Proposal for ConfigureRequest handling
- Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 11:19:10 +0200
If you have to change all WMs anyway (to add support for your new
property), why not change them to deal properly with static gravity
instead ?
If we indeed need a way to advertise support for static gravity by the WM,
wouldn't it be more consistent to add an new atom like
_NET_STATIC_POSITION to _NET_SUPPORTED ?
Matthias
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
