Re: _NET_SUPPORTED

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Bradley T Hughes <bhughes trolltech com> writes: 
> _NET_SUPPORTED
> _NET_SUPPORTED, ATOM[]/32
> This property MUST be set by the Window Manager to indicate which parts of 
> the standard are supported. The list MUST contain all Atoms used by the 
> Window Manager. This assumes that backwards incompatible changes will not be 
> made to the hints (without being renamed).
> 
> (or something to that effect - the point being "hints" doesn't adequately 
> describe the contents of the property - all the state and protocol atoms 
> should be listed in my opinion)
> 

Does this sound bad to anyone? Any objections?

Havoc