Fwd: Re: _NET_SUPPORTED

[julian adams <julian adams gmx net>]

> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 13:52:02 +0000
> To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
> From: julian adams <julian adams gmx net>
> Subject: Re: _NET_SUPPORTED
>
> I think an example will make it clearer in the long term:
>
> At 20:01 14/03/2001, you wrote:
>
> > Bradley T Hughes <bhughes trolltech com> writes:
> > > _NET_SUPPORTED
> > > _NET_SUPPORTED, ATOM[]/32
> > > This property MUST be set by the Window Manager to indicate which 
> > parts of
> > > the standard are supported. The list MUST contain all Atoms used by the
> > > Window Manager. This assumes that backwards incompatible changes will 
> > not be
> > > made to the hints (without being renamed).
>
>
> For example: considering _NET_WM_STATE both this atom and all supported 
> states e.g. _NET_WM_STATE_MODAL, _NET_WM_STATE_STICKY, would be listed.
>
>
> > >
> > > (or something to that effect - the point being "hints" doesn't adequately
> > > describe the contents of the property - all the state and protocol atoms
> > > should be listed in my opinion)
> > >
> >
> > Does this sound bad to anyone? Any objections?
> >
> > Havoc