Re: WM_Sn manager selection

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Sasha_Vasko osca state mo us writes: 
> Definately a good idea. There was also related idea discussed, that
> would provide for supported specs version reporting same way as
> supported ICCCM version is supposed to be reported using selections.
> I remeber it was postponed to allow for faster release of 1.0 version of
> this specs.
> 
> Also does it all go into 1.0 or we will start 2.0 ? With all this requests
> for additional frame geometry properties etc. ?

Should we do a big "call for feature creep" for 2.0 or just kind of
steadily make amendments over time?

i.e. what if we just do 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, etc.? I guess that
has some disadvantages.

> As a sidenote: XKillClient on Window manager is a terrible idea since
> it does not allow WM to restore geometry of reparented windows, and
> make huge mess where virtual desktops are involved.

Of course, but there's no other way to change WM's for now.

Havoc