Re: WM-SPEC - what needs to happen for release ?

[Michael ROGERS <M Rogers cs ucl ac uk>]

>Does anyone else have strong opinions about this?
>
>(I prefer the list-of-atoms approach, but I'd rather get the standard
>finished than waste time arguing about this relatively minor issue)

I second that. A list of atoms is necessary if we want the spec to be 
extensible (to include new window types).

Michael