Re: [Vala] Implicit lamdas/closures

Here I am working my self into brain fever, and not a peep!

No-one says "stop him, the fool" or "darn fiendish cunning" or even "he's using goto's, the churlish knave".

No-ones saying "don't taint the language with your base practicalities" or even "whatever can it mean?"

Someone say something before I get dragged back to more fiscally accountable projects.

If I write the code is it likely to be accepted?


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]