Re: [Vala] Implicit lamdas/closures
- From: Sam Liddicott <sam liddicott com>
- To: vala-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Vala] Implicit lamdas/closures
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 22:48:43 +0100
Here I am working my self into brain fever, and not a peep!
No-one says "stop him, the fool" or "darn fiendish cunning" or even
"he's using goto's, the churlish knave".
No-ones saying "don't taint the language with your base practicalities"
or even "whatever can it mean?"
Someone say something before I get dragged back to more fiscally
If I write the code is it likely to be accepted?
] [Thread Prev