Re: [Vala] [ANNOUNCE] Vala 0.4.0 - Compiler for the GObject type system

[Frederik <scumm_fredo gmx net>]

Jürg Billeter wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 13:19 +0200, Frederik wrote:
> > Jürg Billeter wrote:
> > > The restriction to property assignment statements has been lifted, which
> > > means that you can have any kind of statements in the constructors /
> > > creation methods. However, you should be careful not to mix the two
> > > construction schemes too much. If you want to use the new mechanism,
> > > don't use any construct properties.
> > Thanks for the examples. Is the old scheme still necessary except for
> > backward compatibility? Are there any drawbacks to the new scheme /
> > benefits of the old scheme?
>
> The old scheme is still necessary when subclassing from, for example, a
> GTK+ widget. The plan is to support constructor chain-up in those cases,
> too. The only drawback of the new scheme is that it doesn't completely
> follow the classic GObject scheme, which means that you will also notice
> a difference when subclassing a Vala class from C. However, that still
> works fine and will remain supported, it's just a bit different.
>
> > > You can also call named constructors `base.with_foo ()' and constructors
> > > of the same class `this ()' or `this.with_foo ()'.
> > The latter one (named construction method) could get confused with an
> > instance method invocation. But I can't think of any better way, so I'm
> > ok with that.
>
> For that reason, named construction methods are in the same namespace as
> normal methods in Vala, so we avoid the conflict already upfront.
>
> Jürg

Thanks for your informations.

Regards,

Frederik