Re: [Vala] """Verbatim strings""" vs. "string" "literal" "concatenation"

Jürg Billeter wrote:
This won't cause any issues. Three consecutive " are considered a single
token and will never be interpreted as an empty string followed by
another string. We should certainly add string literal concatenation,
it's just not implemented yet.

That's great news.


@Yu Feng: Verbatim strings don't process any escape sequences and may span multiple lines.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]