Re: [Utopia] [patch] gvm property name changes
- From: Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>
- To: Robert Love <rml ximian com>
- Cc: David Zeuthen <david fubar dk>, utopia-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Utopia] [patch] gvm property name changes
- Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 16:00:36 +0100
On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 10:54 -0400, Robert Love wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 22:45 +0200, David Zeuthen wrote:
>
> Hey, David.
>
> > I've just renamed some properties in hal so here is a patch that updates
> > gvm to use the new property names. In the patch there's a few fixes and
> > I've also made one change you might want to consider:
>
> Thanks!
>
> I checked in everything but this:
>
> > When detecting photos on a volume we add the capability 'camera'. This
> > is nice, but I think this capability name should be reserved for cameras
> > that libgphoto can handle so I've renamed the capability to
> > 'content.photos' - makes sense?
>
> Hm, I dunno. What if gphoto adds support for mass storage (I strongly
> want it to)? It actually has it today, gphoto has some feature could
> directory mode (I think?) that can slurp up trees of photos doing normal
> file I/O. I also do not like the idea of tying a HAL capability to the
> abilities of gphoto, which is a policy decision.
>
> I'm not strongly opinionated on this, though. Your thouhgts? Others
> thoughts?
I'd rather have a way to tell if the mass-storage device is a camera
rather than knowning if the camera is a mass-storage device (which we
can guess from the applications/libgphoto themselves).
---
Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>
His thoughts tumbled in his head, making and breaking alliances like
underpants in a tumble dryer.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]