Re: [Usability] Usability study for GNOME on netbooks?
- From: Paul Cooper <pgc linux intel com>
- To: Stormy Peters <stormy gnome org>
- Cc: usability gnome org, GNOME Mobile <mobile-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Usability] Usability study for GNOME on netbooks?
- Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:13:09 +0000
Hi Stormy,
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 15:53 -0600, Stormy Peters wrote:
> As many of you know, I'm interested in putting together a usability
> study for GNOME on netbooks.
While it's cool that we've got some resources for a usability study I
question whether this is the best vehicle to spend those resources on.
I guess the question in my mind is what is the impact of the results
going to be. I think it's fairly easy to see that stock, out of the box
GNOME has big problems on a netbook, and I fear that all we would get
from a test is a validation of what we know is wrong; default panels
waste precious real estate, targets are too small and menus too fiddly
for the crappy (uh I mean suboptimal) trackpads, certain apps and config
windows are unusable at netbook resolutions, etc, etc.
If we had a 'optimised' GNOME config[1] for netbooks that attempted to
fix most of this 'obvious' low hanging fruit then that would be worth
testing - but getting to that point takes time for people to think about
the design constraints, brainstorm ideas, come up with a plan and then
execute it.
But wait - that's exactly what happened at the Boston Summit! (but not
directly for netbooks). I would suggest that the GNOME Shell would be a
better subject for the testing - it's young enough that the feeback
would have a greater impact in refining new ideas, and reset direction
(if needed). Plus it would help validate a design that is probably the
most user visible change in the GNOME 3.0 plans or warn us if there are
big problems.
So in summary; +1000 for doing a usability study, -1 for doing it on
stock GNOME on a netbook
Paul
[1] For example, the most 'critically acclaimed' netbook UX AFAICT is
the MIE created by HP & Canonical. It looks nothing like a traditional
'desktop' and solves many of the obvious issues. Of course underneath
it's all the familiar GNOME stuff you'd expect but optimised for the
small screen and suboptimal keyboard and trackpad (although the Mini
1000 that it ships on has the best keyboard & trackpad on a netbook that
I've used).
> I've gotten a few quotes from usability companies/contractors and I've
> gotten some interest from advisory board member companies.
>
> However, I could use some help shaping up the study. I'm not a
> usability expert, nor really a GNOME on netbook expert (just a user),
> so I could use some help.
>
> Things left to do:
> - Figure out exactly what we want feedback on,
> - Figure out best way to get useful feedback, (what do we want to
> test)
> - Work with usability experts/companies/consultants to finalize quotes
> based on what we want,
> - Figure out ways to keep costs low by involving volunteers, giving
> things other than money to those that help (publicity, making all the
> data public and accredited to the organization, ...)
> - Finding funds. (I've asked all our traditional sponsoring companies
> and then some and a few are interested in participating and helping
> out financially.)
>
> Anybody interested in helping out?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stormy
> _______________________________________________
> mobile-devel-list mailing list
> mobile-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-devel-list
--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]