Re: [Usability] Spacing between dialog action area and content widget
- From: "Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay" <sankarshanm hotpop com>
- To: "Calum Benson" <Calum Benson sun com>, "Dan Winship" <danw ximian com>
- Cc: "Rodney Dawes" <dobey free fr>, "Christian Neumair" <chris gnome-de org>, <usability gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Usability] Spacing between dialog action area and content widget
- Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 10:02:43 +0530
----- Original Message -----
From: "Calum Benson" <Calum Benson sun com>
> FWIW Seth and I also briefly discussed the possibility of moving to
a
> more GNOME-like (i.e. time-based) release process for the HIG
recently,
> which I'd very much like to see (but it would probably require more
> people on board to do some formal reviewing than have had the time
> and/or interest up to now).
For whatever it will bring in, I believe that this is a sensible
approach to do things. On a very selfish note, I find it appealing for
2 reasons:
[1] Provides a ample time-window to discuss out suggestions and/or
improvements
[2] Allows L10n projects the luxury of catching up with the
incremental releases.
Coming to the [2], does the GUP and/or HIG provide extensive
guidelines on UI specifications for the L10n groups ? This is
currently of (probably) paramount importance. Considering the Indic
L10n, it is sometimes impossible to be able to succintly localise
dialog messages - then what are the tolerances such L10n widgets
should be looking at ? Would it make any quanitfiable difference if
the L10n coordinators are put this question to answer ? Measuring HIG
compliance should form an important activity...
Warm regards
Sankarshan
--------------------
The wider the circle of knowledge, the greater the circumference of
ignorance
--------------------
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.648 / Virus Database: 415 - Release Date: 03/31/2004
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]