RE: [Usability]Attempt at constructive criticism - "Why Gnome 2 s ucks for me"

["Blad, John Erling" <john erling blad aftenposten no>]

This flamewar is not fun at all.

John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ali Akcaagac [mailto:ali akcaagac stud fh-wilhelmshaven de]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:18 PM
> To: usability gnome org
> Subject: Re: [Usability]Attempt at constructive criticism - 
> "Why Gnome 2
> sucks for me"
> 
> 
> On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 21:34, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > If you think GNOME should be the union of all possible desktop
> > environments and endlessly configurable for technical 
> users, then your
> > vision for GNOME is fundamentally at odds with the 
> developer's vision
> > for GNOME. And you should not stay here trying to fight the battle;
> > you should go use another desktop. We have a strong purpose, to
> > actually move Linux out of the 0.5% desktop niche to a broader range
> > of users.
> 
> i always though that gnome was meant to be 'fun'. doing 
> development for
> fun, contributing to it for fun because of the fun. with your last
> sentence in the above paragraph you showed that there are 
> more interest
> behind it. my apologizes that i was fooled with this idea for 
> so long...
> by the way ... you work for redhat don't you ?
> 
> greets and have a nice day...
> 
> Ali Akcaagac
> 
> -- 
> Name....: Ali Akcaagac
> Status..: Student Of Computer & Economic Science
> E-Mail..: mailto:ali akcaagac stud fh-wilhelmshaven de
> WWW.....: http://www.fh-wilhelmshaven.de/~akcaagaa
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Usability mailing list
> Usability gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability
>