Re: [Usability] Padding + "Style"
- From: Gregory Merchan <merchan phys lsu edu>
- To: 'Usability' <usability gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Usability] Padding + "Style"
- Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 22:59:13 -0600
On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 03:52:00PM +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> So,
>
> We have a lovely HIG, but it has more in the way of usability stuff than
> style stuff. That's a good focus to begin with, though.
>
> What are our commonly accepted padding and spacing 'rules'? ProjectBuilder
> on OS X [1] has these wonderful little guidelines that appear as you're
> laying out your UI so you can design to the letter of the Aqua style guide.
> Pretty el-neat-o.
>
> Do we have anything approaching a standard for this, and are current apps
> following it? It doesn't really look like it. ;)
We have this from the ui-guide that was being developed in the hitsquad days:
| In addition, all the spacings have all been standardized in liu of a
| GNOME standard:
|
| The notebook children's border width is 6 pixels, not 8.
|
| The spacing between h/vbox items is 8, not 12.
|
| The border width of frame children is 6 pixels, not 4.
|
| The spacing between table cells is 4 pixels horizontally
| and vertically.
|
| The size of the trough in the pane widget is 12.
|
| Also, anywhere where two or more radio/check buttons are
| together is it's own separate vbox with a spacing of 0 pixels,
| even if this vbox is just nested in another vbox.
There has been some agreement that we should eventually have em-based
spacing, but this is hard to do right now.
> [ Musings on an almost-Sunday, not at all important to the Impending Release
> of GNOME 2. :) ]
>
> - Jeff
>
> [1] I just got an iBook, so everyone has to deal with me getting into OS X
> stylin's. ;)
. . .
> --
> Great minds think different?
Cheers,
Greg Merchan
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]