Re: [Tracker] more issues with indexer-split

[Martyn Russell <martyn imendio com>]

Jamie McCracken wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 18:02 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 11:56 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 16:30 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
> > > > Jamie can we try to get this merge done this week please
> > > sure - just need to check your additions which I will try to do
> > > tonight
> > >
> > > obviously post merge you will have to submit major patches to me
> > > so best to get as much in as possible before that
> > It might make sense for us to continue bleeding edge development in
> > the branch and after (your) intensive review merge that diff to
> > trunk.
> >
> > Not sure how others feel about this?
>
> I dont mind if you want to sync what you have so far with trunk and
> then continue on indexer-split
>
> What you have so far is not ready for a release so it does not make
> much difference whether we merge or not at this point. Obviously if
> martyn and co feel strongly about merging then I will oblige. I have
> full confidence in you guys and am happy to prove it :)

Phillip is right. From day to day when we are all working (and not on
vacation like now) we tend to range on average from 5 to 20 commits a
day. That's quite a lot of review work for you. There are 5 of us
working on Tracker right now and it has been that way for a number of
months. Unless you want more email of course :P

Any thing major would be discussed with you first before it was
implemented and potentially done in a separate branch anyway.

The only thing I would say is that creating a diff for TRUNK is probably
not a good idea. it is probably best to just copy everything right over
after doing a pre-merge tag. There are a LOT of file differences and
created/deleted files too.

If you want me to do the merge, I can, just let me know.

-- 
Regards,
Martyn