Re: [Tracker] just discovered gls3
- From: "Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen" <mikkel kamstrup gmail com>
- To: "Jamie McCracken" <jamiemcc blueyonder co uk>
- Cc: Erlend Davidson <E R M Davidson sms ed ac uk>, tracker-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Tracker] just discovered gls3
- Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:29:44 +0100
2006/12/15, Jamie McCracken <
jamiemcc blueyonder co uk>:
Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
> 2006/12/14, Jon Phillips <jon rejon org <mailto:jon rejon org>>:
>
> On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 13:50 +0000, Jamie McCracken wrote:
> > Erlend Davidson wrote:
> > > Well, won't GLS3 obsolete Tracker once it's finished and stable
> > > (which will take a much longer time than it will take
> Tracker)? Is
> > > it an entirely new filesystem, or a filesystem that lives on top of
> > > an existing one?
> >
> > its not a physical file system and does not really do anything that
> > tracker does not
> >
> > It uses FUSE to expose a user space filesystem in the same way that
> > tracker uses trackerdFS and beagle uses BeagleFS
> >
> > Its similiar to tracker but written in C++ and so uses different
> > technologies.
> >
> > I expect it to be much heavier than tracker though as its using
> Postgres
> > and not Sqlite like tracker.
> >
> > Also no Dbus and no C bindings so its not really feaible for
> Gnome or
> > XFCE at the moment. I dont think there is any integration with
> any gnome
> > stuff (Deskbar or Nautilus)
> >
> > Also seems to lack RDF ability for the metadata but otherwise is
> pretty
> > close to tracker in both scope and target audience (IE its not
> just a
> > dedicated indexer like Beagle or Strigii and like tracker closely
> > couples DB and Indexer).
>
> it seems to me that the greatest place for these softwares to share code
> is in the various ways these services are exposed. i'm thinking gui:
> search, indexing, preferences, etc. what do you all think are areas
> where these projects can work together (which is vital).
>
>
> This is partially the goal of the Wasabi unification project. It is
> currently discussed on the xdg list at freedesktop.org
> <
http://freedesktop.org> (look for the "simple search api" threads).
>
> The first goals of Wasabi is to come up with a unified dbus api for
> desktop search engines. With that it is possible to write a generic gui.
Im going to implement live query stuff over XMAS and would like to use
the Wasabi api - is it anywhere near complete/accepted?
I posed two questions in my last post to xdg. Could you please comment on them (preferably on xdg)? I'm thinking about this mail:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xdg/2006-December/008918.html - the two questions at the bottom.
Depending on how people respond to those questions there is possible some changes in store for the live api...
Cheers,
Mikkel
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]