Re: Patch: fix the progress information when refreshing an imap folder

[Sergio Villar Senin <svillar igalia com>]

Martin Bonnin escribiu:

> I kind of agree with you. But in this specific case, checking the
> "what" parameter is still not enough because it is the same in both
> cases.
> Problem is that the the "bad" progress is deep inside camel operation
> and I'm not sure to what it refers.
> Maybe we could just wrap the camel_imap_command_response() between
> calls to camel_operation_start() and camel_operation_end() but  this
> is more invasive as a change...

Well, if we don't really know which kind of information it is, we always
can remove the call to camel_operation_progress in that particular
situation or ?

Br