Re: New todo summary

[Philip Van Hoof <spam pvanhoof be>]

On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 19:24 +0100, Sergio Villar Senin wrote:
> Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> >> - TnyAsyncFolder/TnyFolder refactoring (not sure yet) (low priority)
> > 
> > I'm getting more and more in favour of this. Why? Simple!
> > 
> > Because that would allow an application developer to wrap his own
> > implementation of asynchronousy around normal implementations.
> 
> This seems to be a good reason. I'm not sure that it could be a common
> situation (I mean, it is good to be flexible, but it's not a good idea
> to waste efforts making flexible stuff all around) but anyway, as you
> said the cost of change is ridiculous for anybody building apps on top
> of tinymail.
> 
> > But what do other people think? I'm keeping it a low priority for now.
> 
> The question is, will this approach be used for all the interfaces that
> offer async methods?

Yes, that would then be the idea indeed.

> >> - Testing tny_folder_get_msg_async (urgent)
> 
> I'm testing it also right now.

Great, let me know if you find defects.


-- 
Philip Van Hoof, software developer
home: me at pvanhoof dot be
gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org
blog: http://pvanhoof.be/blog