Hi! > > I usually don't use the advanced mode, and people I have seen don't do > > it also. I think that the point is to think how many times you use the > > advanced configuration and if it is less that 10%, it is good to have > > all this options hided. > > I agree that there are several options that should be hidden (if you > need to touch them, they're so advanced you won't mind to edit some text > files, but you're clearly a side case, i.e.: advanced PPP options) but > there are some things that aren't shown in the basic mode that I'd like > to keep, like: > > - groups editing in the users tool > - several runlevels editing in services tool > - service priorities in SystemV based distros (I'd like to remove this, > but until we find a way to guess it, it should be shown) > > maybe we should mix basic and advanced mode before hiding the button? > Hiding the button or removing it? In the mix, will be removed some features? Cheers > Carlos > > > > > Cheers > > > > > What's your opinion about this? :) > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > [1] http://www.tuxerver.net/~garnacho/services.jpg > > > [2] http://www.tuxerver.net/~garnacho/services2.jpg > > > _______________________________________________ > > > system-tools-list mailing list > > > system-tools-list gnome org > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/system-tools-list > > _______________________________________________ > > system-tools-list mailing list > > system-tools-list gnome org > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/system-tools-list
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente
