[Setup-tool-hackers] Where XST is going, Debian and other things.
- From: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <jsogo debian org>
- To: setup-tools-hackers ximian com
- Subject: [Setup-tool-hackers] Where XST is going, Debian and other things.
- Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 16:19:46 +0200
Hello!
I'm the current mantainer of XST in Debian. I should have subscribed
before to this list, but well you know... too many email yet. (But I'm
now susbcribed :)
Well about Chema's post I only can say that focusing a bit more in
Debian is really great. I'll try to provide you as much as help as I
could, and I'm sure that Debian users also will help you a lot. Of
course other distributions must be also taken into account, but I think
that you should try to get some support of them.
About the integration with other Debian tools, would be great that
backends guys and PGI worked together in that part. Integration with
debconf will be perhaps more difficult. Debconf is aimed to provide a
consistent configuration system through all Debian packages, and XST
are more focused in desktop user. I think that XST can be a great tool
for a project called Debian Desktop, or something like that, which
installed a GNOME desktop by default and aimed to users who don't need
to know a lot about Linux to use it, but not for the main project. We
cannot think about writing backends for all the packages that use
debconf for their configuration.
IMHO some things could be done that will help to spread the use of
XST, not only in Debian but also among other distributions:
- Put backends into an independient CVS module, and call them
with a generic name (not GNOME related)
- Make a nice front-end for GNOME (continuing the work has been
made yet :)
- Make a KDE front-end (yeah, I'm not kidding). Of course this
won't be the work of the group of people that right now is here,
but I think that this should be talked with KDE people. If backends
are completely independient, they shouldn't have any problem with
making that front-end.
I think that this will make XST use spread a lot, as vendors such as
Mandrake could use it in the desktop. Of course both KDE and GNOME
front ends should be consistent, so I think that exchanging ideas
between the both groups could be really great.
If somebody here knows some KDE people, he could ask them what they
think about this point. Working twice in the same is a pity, and this
is one of the main advantages of Free Software.
Well, it is great to see that XST won't die. I was a bit worried
because I wasn't seeing almost any movement in their development, and
it would be a pity that such a great tools were trhown into the trash.
I really hope you can find enough people to go on with this work.
Thanks
José Carlos García Sogo
jsogo@debian.org
PGP signature
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]