Re: Splitting seahorse into seahorse/seahorse-plugins



On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 18:28 -0500, Adam Schreiber wrote:
>
> I'm not entirely sure what this gets us, but maybe it could be the
> impetus for breaking out a more public facing section of interfaces
> from libseahorse that could be used in cases where gpgme is complex
> and the DBus interface is too simplistic.

Just to chime in, for us on Gentoo, and for many others soon, gpgme is a
pita. For reasons I don't really want to go into there, to many bugs,
different posts to our -dev ml, etc. It's a mess. Some what summed up
here[1]. Anything to avoid use of gpgme seems best at this time.

Wrt to seahorse there aren't any problems. Works fine with gnupg-2, just
has to be chained into session per known doc. In fact we are going to be
provided the xinitrc.d script with the seahorse install so it should
work out of the box for users :)

     1. http://marc.info/?l=gentoo-dev&m=120006401320247&w=2

-- 
William L. Thomson Jr.
Gentoo/amd64/Java

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]