Re: [PATCH] Re: Removing old cruft



Am Sonntag, den 27.09.2009, 20:50 +0200 schrieb Christopher Roy
Bratusek:
> Am Sonntag, den 27.09.2009, 12:47 -0600 schrieb Michal Jaegermann:
> > On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 08:30:30PM +0200, Christopher Roy Bratusek wrote:
> > > 
> > > > I like a flexibility of such approach; only by a default it could
> > > > search through few options somewhere is a setup.  Like
> > > > /usr/bin/paplay, /usr/bin/aplay, /usr/bin/play.
> > > 
> > > Of course this aspect is also configurable (since ages):
> > 
> > I realize that.  I was talking "out-of-the-box" without user
> > required to configure anything and a default usable in different
> > circumstances.
> 
> by default sounds are disabled and on modern systems PulseAudio is
> atleast installed. The advanced user shouldn't have a problem changing
> this via SawfishConfig or SawfishRC (OPTIONS should be almost complete)
> 
> For me this is a good compromiss.
> 
> > > 
> > > additionally you may use the following in your sawfish-config:
> > > 
> > > [program-available is an addition of 1.6.0]
> > 
> > Even in older versions you can find (gnome-exec-in-path filename)
> > in menus.jl so it is not exactly a mystery how to achieve that.
> > With program-available a setup code can all the more walk through
> > few possibilities and pick up the first match from a default list.
> > 

gnome-exec-in-path is no longer available in 1.6.0. In 1.6.0 I've
trimmed down the GNOME-Specific code to the minimum.

Chris

> >   Michal
> > 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]