Re: naming: user.jl -> launcher.jl / application.jl ... ?
- From: Teika Kazura <teika lavabit com>
- To: sawfish-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: naming: user.jl -> launcher.jl / application.jl ... ?
- Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:12:14 +0900 (JST)
Hi. Again, we lived in different world ;) Let me fix.
I meant wm/commands/user.jl, not wm/user.jl .
(I thought your reply weird, looked into wm/user.jl, oh!!)
But it contains clipboards, too. Maybe we'd better wait and see.
On the first impression, it seemed to me that workspace funcs should
go into wm/workspace.jl
Teika (Teika kazura)
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 09:39:36 +0200, Christopher Roy Bratusek wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 12.09.2009, 12:57 +0900 schrieb Teika Kazura:
>> Hi. Thanks, Chris, very much, for user.jl efforts which starts
>> The name user.jl seemingly isn't best. Candidates I can give are
>> "launcher" and "application". (I think launcher is better.) Any better
>> Name is important. Users who read the code for the first time can
>> reduce much time if it gives the right impression on what it is.
>> But it IS difficult to choose the appropriate one. Yep.
>> Teika (Teika kazura)
> I think user.jl is the best, as it loads the user-configuration and
> stuff like that (generated fdo-menu). KDE/GNOME-Integration is loaded by
> default.jl, actually user.jl does not start applications. I plan on
> sawfish.wm.session.manager/autostart for stuff like that.
] [Thread Prev