Re: naming: user.jl -> launcher.jl / application.jl ... ?

[Teika Kazura <teika lavabit com>]

Hi. Again, we lived in different world ;) Let me fix.
I meant wm/commands/user.jl, not wm/user.jl .
(I thought your reply weird, looked into wm/user.jl, oh!!)
But it contains clipboards, too. Maybe we'd better wait and see.

On the first impression, it seemed to me that workspace funcs should
go into wm/workspace.jl

Regards,
Teika (Teika kazura)

On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 09:39:36 +0200, Christopher Roy Bratusek wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 12.09.2009, 12:57 +0900 schrieb Teika Kazura:
>> Hi. Thanks, Chris, very much, for user.jl efforts which starts
>> applications.
>> 
>> The name user.jl seemingly isn't best. Candidates I can give are
>> "launcher" and "application". (I think launcher is better.) Any better
>> idea?
>> 
>> Name is important. Users who read the code for the first time can
>> reduce much time if it gives the right impression on what it is.
>> 
>> But it IS difficult to choose the appropriate one. Yep.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Teika (Teika kazura)
>> 
> I think user.jl is the best, as it loads the user-configuration and
> stuff like that (generated fdo-menu). KDE/GNOME-Integration is loaded by
> default.jl, actually user.jl does not start applications. I plan on
> sawfish.wm.session.manager/autostart for stuff like that.