Re: rep could not find interpreter.jl

[cheneymx <lizhuochen gmail com>]

Flashrider wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 09:24:25 -0700 (PDT)
> cheneymx <lizhuochen gmail com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Flashrider wrote:
>> > 
>> > On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 08:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
>> > cheneymx <lizhuochen gmail com> wrote:
>> > 
>> >> 
>> >> Hello everyone,
>> >> 
>> >> Today I tried updating from sawfish 1.3.3 (the stabil version in
>> >> Gentoo-Portage) to sawfish
>> >> 1.5. So I had to at first install librep 0.90.0 by using following
>> >> command:
>> >> 
>> >> --------------------------------
>> >> $ configure --prefix /usr && make && make install
>> >> --------------------------------
>> >> 
>> >> Everything built OK but when I started to run 'rep', then I got
>> >> folloing error message:
>> >> 
>> >> --------------------------------
>> >> error--> (file-error "No such file or directory"
>> >> "rep/lang/interpreter") --------------------------------
>> >> 
>> >> But the file exists already in the path:
>> >> /usr/share/rep/0.90.0/lisp/rep/lang/iterpreter.jl'
>> >> 
>> >> I then tried reverting librep to 0.17 by using the ebuild in
>> >> Gentoo-Portage.
>> >> 
>> >> Again, the rep can not find the file in
>> >> '/usr/share/rep/0.17/lisp/rep/lang/iterpreter.jl'
>> >> 
>> >> After searching for a long time in internet, I found a temporal
>> >> solution: set the enviroment
>> >> variable 'REP_LOAD_PATH=/usr/share/rep/0.17/lisp' and the rep can
>> >> now find the files, but now I
>> >> can not compile sawfish anymore, because the makefiles of sawfish
>> >> using also this enviroment
>> >> variable.
>> >> 
>> >> I have really no idea, why the rep can not find the files, which
>> >> were installed by himself.
>> >> 
>> >> Could anybody help?
>> >> 
>> >> Regards
>> >> Li
>> > 
>> > What libtool version do you have? I also can't figure out why, but
>> > using ./autogen.sh instead of configure may solve the issue.
>> > 
>> > Chris
>> > 
>> >  
>> > 
>> 
>> my libtool version: 1.5.26  (the newest stabil version in
>> Gentoo-Portage)
>> 
> 
> ... that *may* cause the issue, dunno. could you try with libtool 2.2?
> 
>> I have tried ./autogen.sh, but the issue was not solved.
>> 
>> following is the output by autogen.sh: 
>> 
>> == == == == == == == == == == == == ==
>> 
>> librep:	0.90.0
>> 
>> == == == == == == == == == == == == ==
>> 
>> prefix:       /usr
>> exec_prefix:  ${prefix}
>> libdir:       ${exec_prefix}/lib
>> libexecdir:   ${exec_prefix}/libexec
>> 
>> == == == == == == == == == == == == ==
>> 
>> compiler:	gcc
>> cflags:	-g -O2 -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wmissing-prototypes
>> preprocessor: gcc -E
>> cppflags:
>> ldflags:
>> makeflags:
>> 
>> == == == == == == == == == == == == ==
>> 
>> libgmp:	yes
>> libgdbm:	yes
>> readline:	yes
>> libffi:	no
>> 
>> == == == == == == == == == == == == ==
>> 
>> During the whole compilation I have not seen any errors. 
>> 
>> Regards 
>> Li
>  
> 
Hello,
I'm glad, that I have found the reason: the prefix should be /usr/local, and
I have
changed to prefix=/usr.

I used 'starce' to trace the 'rep', and found that the rep search the
interpreter in '/usr/local',
that is the prefix by default.

-------------------------------------------------
access("/usr/local/share/rep/0.90.0/lisp/rep/lang/interpreter.jlc", R_OK) =
-1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
-------------------------------------------------

I have changed the prefix during the compilation, because I hat read the
following article

http://www.mail-archive.com/sawfish-list gnome org/msg01974.html

The article said: there always have been problems installing librep into
something different
than /usr.

I think that has been changed recently.

Thank you all the same!

Li

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/rep-could-not-find-interpreter.jl-tp24667647p24670134.html
Sent from the Gnome - Sawfish mailing list archive at Nabble.com.