XFree86
- From: "Gabor Z. Papp" <gzp papp hu>
- To: General discussion about sawfish wm <sawfish-list gnome org>
- Subject: XFree86
- Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:28:49 +0100
* Christopher Bratusek <nano-master gmx de>:
| which makes maintainance easier. Currently this rework breaks build
| with XFree86 instead of X.Org,
| I _may_ add that back, but: GTK+ has been synced with X.Org 7 several
| times (mostly in gdk) and the
| last time XFree86 was mentioned in GTK+ was in 2.4 times, so does
| anybody now, if GTK+ does still
| compile on XFree86, I guess not, if so, there's no need to add those
| checks back. On the other hand
| so or so _no_ distro, that is not dead or ancient, does ship XFree86
| anymore ... so I'm not for adding
| checks back. any comments on this?
Yes, some comments. :-)
XFree86 isn't dead, 4.8.0 released some weeks ago. Compiles fine on
old and recent systems (glibc and gcc combinations). Same with GTK+ & co.
For example on some desktops I'm using kernel 2.4 with glibc 2.3 and
the recent glib/gtk+ stuffs, like glib 2.19.x, and gtk+ 2.16.x.
So dunno why XFree86 went into trash here. Most distros prefer X.org
over XFree86, but that doesn't mean XFree86 doesn't works.
Not only distros are on the World. ;-)
Bonus: I have some NVidia based desktops too using the NVidia binary
only drivers for both 2.4 and 2.6 kernels.
Anyway, after removing bogus configure parts finding XFree86 stuffs
(really pkg-config the only way to find headers and libs?...) I have
successfuly built and using latest sawfish repo.
Please restore XFree86 in configure.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]