Re: [Patch] rep-gtk and rep-gtk.pc destination

Am Montag, den 05.01.2009, 19:23 +0100 schrieb Jan Kasprzak:
Christopher Bratusek wrote:
: You're right. The next time I'm on my pc I'll commit patches to all
: three (librep, rep-gtk and sawfish).

	I think librep is OK, and sawfish does not even have any
pkgconfig file nor any files under /usr/lib (it uses /usr/libexec).
Only rep-gtk has this problem.


Didn't check librep. And no, sawfish has a sawfish.pc. not in, but in 1.5.0svn


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]