> So the question here is where to draw the line for gupnp-av. Currently
> it is a helper library for writing and parsing DIDL-Lite fragments. That
> makes it useful for many applications and as such ensures that many
> applications will provide proper DIDL-Lite and that many applications
> can share the parser code.
>
I would like to propose, following this line of thought, that the current gupnpav become gupnp-didl and the new mediaserver specifics become gupnpav. I think this is a reasonable solution