Re: [Rhythmbox-devel] Plugin Activation/Deactivation
- From: "Nicholas S. Clarkson" <nclarkson sporadicspeculations com>
- To: Adam Zimmerman <adam_zimmerman sfu ca>
- Cc: rhythmbox-devel gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Rhythmbox-devel] Plugin Activation/Deactivation
- Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 12:21:20 -0700
This does work but only for restoring the state. You would still have to
save the state manually.
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 11:05 -0800, Adam Zimmerman wrote:
> > > On Dec 26, 2007 12:24 PM, Nicholas S. Clarkson
> > > <nclarkson sporadicspeculations com> wrote:
> > > I am writing a Rhythmbox plugin to save and restore the
> > > playing song. I
> > > have got my plugin to work through a menu option but I would
> > > rather it
> > > work on load and close. However, it appears that the db and
> > > play
> > > functions I am trying to use are not available to my plugin at
> > > activation/deactivation. Is there a way to adjust the time at
> > > which my
> > > plugin is activate/deactivated so that the necessary functions
> > > are
> > > available?
> > >
> > > Nice plugin idea. Would it be too much to ask you to post the source
> > > for your plugin? I don't have a ready answer to your question, but I'm
> > > wondering if we might be able to figure something clever out.
> > >
> > > Off the top of my head, I'm wondering if we move the code from
> > > activate() to a new function if that'd make a difference.
>
> A rather horrible approach would be to set a timeout in the activate()
> function for long enough that rhythmbox is *likely* to be ready... You'd
> have to catch an exception in the case that it wasn't ready (and
> presumably continue the timer instead of stopping it).
>
> If that's the approach you want to take, look at the gobject.timeout_add
> function. It's called like:
>
> gobject.timeout_add(6 * 60 * 60 * 1000, self.__update_catalogue)
>
> with the first argument being the number of milliseconds to wait, and
> the second being the function to call. If the function returns False
> then the timeout is discarded. If it returns anything else, then the
> timeout function is called again in another n milliseconds.
>
> Like I said, it's probably not a very "clean" way to do it, but it would
> likely work.
>
> --
> Adam Zimmerman <adam_zimmerman sfu ca>
>
> CREATIVITY - http://mirrors.creativecommons.org/movingimages/Building_on_the_Past.mpg
> ALWAYS - http://www.musiccreators.ca/
> BUILDS - http://www.ubuntu.com/
> ON THE PAST - http://www.theopencd.org/
> --
>
> Work consists of whatever a body is obliged to do.
> Play consists of whatever a body is not obliged to do.
> -- Mark Twain
>
> _______________________________________________
> rhythmbox-devel mailing list
> rhythmbox-devel gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]