Re: [Rhythmbox-devel] What makes Rhythmbox 0.9.3? =)

[George Jenkins <gvj11 student canterbury ac nz>]

James Livingston wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 06:11 +0100, Martin Jeppesen wrote:
>   
> > I can see at
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/reports/weekly-bug-summary.html
> >
> > at lot of bug fixing have been going on in Rhythmbox, so I am
> > wondering; What is required for the next tar ball of Rhythmbox? =)
> >     
>
>   
[snip]
> What seems best to me, assume those kinds of things aren't going to get
> fixed in the next few days, is to release 0.9.3 sooner rather than
> later. We can do a 0.9.4 release shortly after, if they get implemented.
>
>   
Personally my preference would be to see a release sooner rather than 
later. I have been using Rhythmbox CVS lately, rather than 0.9.2 on my 
Gentoo system as it fixes the aforementioned bugs. From a a users 
perspective (many thanks btw for all the hard work that has gone into 
Rhythmbox) it would be nice to see a stable release to stand upon again.

Thanks, George.

=======================================================================
This email, including any attachments, is only for the intended
addressee.  It is subject to copyright, is confidential and may be
the subject of legal or other privilege, none of which is waived or
lost by reason of this transmission.
If the receiver is not the intended addressee, please accept our
apologies, notify us by return, delete all copies and perform no
other act on the email.
Unfortunately, we cannot warrant that the email has not been
altered or corrupted during transmission.
=======================================================================