Queue UI again (was Re: [Rhythmbox-devel] Last.fm Integration Patch #5)
- From: Jonathan Matthew <jonathan kaolin hn org>
- To: rhythmbox-devel gnome org
- Subject: Queue UI again (was Re: [Rhythmbox-devel] Last.fm Integration Patch #5)
- Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 08:18:54 +1000
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 03:54:17PM -0500, John Drouhard wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:44:45 +0200
> Ruben Vermeersch <ruben Lambda1 be> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 08:12 +1000, Jonathan Matthew wrote:
> >
> > The whole "I want it as a big box" vs "I want it as a playlist" thing?
> > Instead of permanently hiding the Now Playing playlist, why not only
> > hide it when "Show queue" has been selected (thus you can easily
> > toggle between both UIs). But that's something for another thread :-)
> >
>
> Why make it a playlist, when you can just add another pane to the
> sidebar that has a list of songs in it as the queue. Like so:
> [tabdamage elided]
http://j.kaolin.hn.org/rhythmbox-queue-with-details.png
(screenshot does not imply I currently have working code - this is
several months old, from the arch --merge branch)
This is the approach I preferred last time. There are two main
arguments against it:
- it clutters the UI
- it gets awkward to use when you queue up more songs than can be shown
in the sidebar
and my only response to both of those is "yes, but I don't mind".
I think the only way we'll resolve this is by allowing you to switch
between the two.
> That way, people can just drag songs from the music browser into the
> queue list and it will be appended to the bottom.
>
> Rhythmbox will then check to see if there are any songs in the queue
> after a song finishes, or after a user presses the skip button. If
> there is, it will then play the next song in the queue, and continue
> downwards until there are no more, then go back to playing music
> normally.
This is exactly how it works, and I don't think anyone's arguing
about this part of it.
> Sorry about my ASCII art, but it's hard for me to explain what I meant
> in words.
>
> Oh, and maybe this idea has already been brought up before, I haven't
> been on the list for very long.
The idea has been around for a while. It's good to know that the
queue-as-source vs queue-as-sidebar thing doesn't only exist in the
heads of people who've been told that those are the only choices.
-jonathan
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]