Re: [Rhythmbox-devel] Re: usage question


> Another reason for a plug-in system is that not all users want to use all
> the features. For example, I wouldn't use a visualization system if such a
> system were to ever make it into rhythmbox. Also, the plug-in system could
> potentially speed the development of plug-in especially if there was a
> scripting interface as suggested earlier.

Isn't this handled by compile time options? I think arch cancels out the
need for plugins - all someone has to do to get a feature they want is
download the most recent patch from whatever arch archive is doing work
on it.

-- Matt Jones

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]