Re: [Rhythmbox-devel] Re: Syncing the RhythmDB on every update

I was going to mention using the wonderful work done by the gnome-db team, 
but I don't know what kind of stuff that will introduce.  I suggest that 
if you can use their stuff we should, otherwise default either to sqlite 
or to the xml backend.


 > On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 12:43, Andreas Bombe wrote:
> > gdbm, sqlite, same difference.  SQLite seems quite nifty.  I'd start to
> > write a backend using SQLite if nobody else really wants to.
> Ok, that'd be cool.  We're talking about major work here though,
> definitely more something for 1.0.
> > Granted, this is probably overengineering.  IMHO we should still keep
> > the XML backend around to export/import the rhythmdb.  Instead of
> > dumping on every shutdown, I guess it would be enough to provide a
> > command line option for exporting the db.
> That's fine, sure.  If we have SQLite though, I don't know why you would
> want to switch to anything else.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]