On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 12:43, Andreas Bombe wrote: > gdbm, sqlite, same difference. SQLite seems quite nifty. I'd start to > write a backend using SQLite if nobody else really wants to. Ok, that'd be cool. We're talking about major work here though, definitely more something for 1.0. > Granted, this is probably overengineering. IMHO we should still keep > the XML backend around to export/import the rhythmdb. Instead of > dumping on every shutdown, I guess it would be enough to provide a > command line option for exporting the db. That's fine, sure. If we have SQLite though, I don't know why you would want to switch to anything else.
This is a digitally signed message part