Re: [Rhythmbox-devel] Rhythmbox arch tree

On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 00:00, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 05:19, Colin Walters wrote:
> > I've been working on a new (more scalable/optimized) backend for the
> > last week or so, and it's been growing in steadily in
> > rhythmbox/rhythmdb/.  It's really at the point now where I need to start
> > touching other code to use it so I can test it.  
> > 
> > This will end up modifying a lot of code, so I really need to have a
> > branch, since we need to make stable releases while the rhythmdb work is
> > ongoing.  However CVS absolutely, absolutely sucks at branching.  And
> > I've been excited about the "arch" revision control system lately.  I
> > think it is quite frankly the future of free software revision control. 
> > Still a bit rough around the edges, but getting better and better every
> > day.
> <snip>
> I'll just note that the ChangeLog format of arch is atrocious. I mean,
> even BitKeeper changes entries are more readable.

And it also breaks all the docs:
scrollkeeper-update -o /usr//share/omf/rhythmbox
/usr/share/gnome/help/rhythmbox/C/legal.xml:4: error: XML declaration
allowed only at the start of the document
<?xml version="1.0" ?>

Bastien Nocera <> 
Quitters never win, winners never quit. But those who never win and
never quit are idiots.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]