Re: State of nautilus-sendto for 3.8

Hey, just a little update on this.

Since I didn't get approval from i18n, I went ahead and released nautilus 3.7.92 without the string changes for now.
As there are no other code changes involved, I think it's fine to commit that before 3.8.0, should the change be approved and the n-s-t part merged/released as well in time.


On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net> wrote:
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 13:20 +0100, Frederic Peters wrote:
> Cosimo Cecchi wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Cosimo Cecchi <cosimoc gnome org> wrote:
> >
> > > Patches are on the bug report, feedback and comments appreciated.
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> >
> > Any opinion on this?
> > No 3.7 tarball of nautilus-sendto has been released yet, and I'm planning
> > to release nautilus 3.7.92 later today, so there would still potentially be
> > time for the change to be included in this release.
> >
> > Even if I didn't spell it explicitly in my previous message, the change
> > implies an UI freeze break request for nautilus-sendto, and a string freeze
> > break request for nautilus.
> I'd prefer to remove nautilus-sendto from 3.8; it's in my opinion way
> too late in the schedule to get those changes in and appropriately
> tested.

Those changes are based on the existing nautilus-sendto code, they're
nicely separated, and they've been better tested than nautilus-sendto
had the chance to be in the past couple of releases.

> Still, I'd let this slip in, be tested in .92, translated, and removed
> from 3.8.0 if necessary.

Cool. FWIW, the only string changes are the 2 strings in nautilus,
there's nothing more to translate in nautilus-sendto itself.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]