Re: doable non-forceful tasks

On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Olav Vitters <olav bkor dhs org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:53:49AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>> This sounds like a very good description of what we already have in
>> the form of 'gnome goals' ( Looking
>> at the currently written-up goals there, I think we should promote the
>> "Remove use of Glib deprecated symbols" one (and add another one for
>> deprecated GTK+ symbols).  That will help with the GTK3 conversion
>> down the road. I've also talked to the translators about "Migrate from
>> using string context to msgctxt" and they are eager to see that
>> completed this cycle too - I've actually done it for GTK+ in trunk
>> last night.
>> Other than than, we might also want to write up the already proposed
>> 'get rid of libgnome' as a goal, so that we can track the progress
>> better.
> Wonder how many deprecated symbols are in use now.
> I saw some bug about having maintainer mode turn on also the error thing
> about single includes. But perhaps that is too much?

Its worth writing out as a separate goal, I think. Then both can
proceed at their own speed.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]