Re: doable non-forceful tasks

On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:53:49AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> This sounds like a very good description of what we already have in
> the form of 'gnome goals' ( Looking
> at the currently written-up goals there, I think we should promote the
> "Remove use of Glib deprecated symbols" one (and add another one for
> deprecated GTK+ symbols).  That will help with the GTK3 conversion
> down the road. I've also talked to the translators about "Migrate from
> using string context to msgctxt" and they are eager to see that
> completed this cycle too - I've actually done it for GTK+ in trunk
> last night.
> Other than than, we might also want to write up the already proposed
> 'get rid of libgnome' as a goal, so that we can track the progress
> better.

Wonder how many deprecated symbols are in use now.

I saw some bug about having maintainer mode turn on also the error thing
about single includes. But perhaps that is too much?


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]