Re: GNOME 2.23/2.24 - Schedule Proposals
- From: "Lucas Rocha" <lucasr gnome org>
- To: "Andre Klapper" <ak-47 gmx net>
- Cc: release-team gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME 2.23/2.24 - Schedule Proposals
- Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 00:06:55 +0200
2008/2/8, Andre Klapper <ak-47 gmx net>:
> Am Dienstag, den 05.02.2008, 16:21 +0200 schrieb Lucas Rocha:
> > Here are three proposals for the GNOME 2.23/2.24 release schedule:
> > http://live.gnome.org/LucasRocha/TwoPointTwentythree
> > Which one do you prefer? Comments? Additional proposals?
> i'm late, my 2 cents:
> i want to have api freeze on a monday *without* a release like for 2.21.
> having a broken api and only 2 days to fix is worse than having a broken
> api and 9 days to fix + many beta testers.
In the scope of proposal 3, we could move the API/ABI freeze from week
21 to week 20 or 22. However, I still think we should try to associate
all freezes with specific releases (expect for the hard code one) as
much as we can. It's easier for maintainers to keep track of the
freezes this way. I don't think they keep looking at the calendar very
often. Maybe they (we?) should. :-P
What do the others think?
> it's not that high priority though.
> and we should definitely release gnome in september, that's what our
> customers (=distros) expect from us. if we plan to move this into
> october we must announce this early enough to the distros.
Well, so far we're about to agree on a schedule proposal with the
release still in September. I don't think this will change much.
] [Thread Prev