Re: Sound Juicer change...

["Elijah Newren" <newren gmail com>]

On 3/20/06, Ross Burton <ross burtonini com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-03-19 at 20:30 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
> > > If taglibid3mux will be promoted to -good soon, then people will have
> > > the plugin and I don't really see the point of adding this to
> > > sound-juicer (apart from releasing a new tarball in the next few days
> > > for this issue).
> >
> > Will it be in -good in 0.10.x of gstreamer; will it be out in time for
> > Gnome 2.14.1?
>
> It should be in 0.10.x, but may or may not be in time for 2.14.1.  This
> depends on the relevant people reviewing and promoting the plugin, which
> I can't do.
>
> > > I'm not really fond of this, but other people in the release team might
> > > agree with you.
> >
> > How big is a copy of id3mux?  Am I correct in understanding that it's
> > a temporary 2.14.x solution to an ugly bug; a solution that shouldn't
> > have any ill side-effects other than bloat?
>
> gsttaglib.c is 16K.  It is indeed an ugly solution, once I can
> hard-depend on the relevant version of gstreamer-plugins this hack can
> be dropped.

Well, since the ugliness will only be temporary and fixes an uglier
bug, I'm okay with it.