Re: New dependency?
- From: "Vincent Untz" <vuntz gnome org>
- To: "Elijah Newren" <newren gmail com>
- Cc: Gnome Release Team <release-team gnome org>, Carlos Garnacho <carlosg gnome org>
- Subject: Re: New dependency?
- Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 11:07:47 +0200 (CEST)
On Tue, June 6, 2006 18:47, Elijah Newren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It looks like system-tools-backends now has a hard dependency on
> Net::DBus (perl bindings to dbus). I don't recall seeing this
> discussed anywhere (my apologies if I missed it), and I'm not sure
> that the community would be accepting of it as a dependency for the
> Gnome desktop (I'm not saying it wouldn't be, just that I'm not sure
> it would be). Granted, system-tools-backends is classified as an
> external module, but gnome-system-tools depends on it. We'll need to
> get this resolved somehow; either making it a soft dependency or
> getting community consensus to accept it (and possibly thus blessing
> perl bindings in general). Suggestions?
>
> Thanks for all your hard work on GNOME system tools. :)
I think we'll reach consensus that it's okay to use it: aren't we in
love with dbus now? ;-) Also, I'm a bit reluctant on imposing
restrictions on our blessed dependencies/external modules: we should
definitely tell their maintainers when we're not happy, but doing
more might not be sensible from us.
Now, what about liboobs? :-) I guess it should be included in the
desktop set.
Vincent
--
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]