Re: GNOME and GStreamer
- From: Thomas Vander Stichele <thomas apestaart org>
- To: "Ronald S. Bultje" <rbultje ronald bitfreak net>
- Cc: release-team <release-team gnome org>, Ross Burton <ross burtonini com>, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller <uraeus linuxrising org>, Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>, Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>, Tim Müller <t i m zen co uk>
- Subject: Re: GNOME and GStreamer
- Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:55:22 +0100
On Sat, 2006-01-14 at 11:36 -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-01-14 at 08:58 +0100, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote:
> > Are you sure about the second ? The branch to check is
> > BRANCH-GSTREAMER-0-8, Tim refined and commited his patches, I've tested
> > things yesterday, and everything worked straight out of the box with
> > current CVS of GStreamer - which will get released on Monday.
>
> Just to make sure it's clear:
> - you need maintainer approval to commit patches
> - the maintainer actively and explicitely did not approve
> - you committed the patches anyway
> Please just leave my modules to my liking, thank you.
Let's not get carried away here.
First of all, because of your objections (and only because of yours) the
committing was done one a branch. AFAIK everyone is free to make
branches.
Second, the MAINTAINERS file lists two maintainers, and only one of them
is you.
Why are you being this contrary ? I realize you've invested a lot of
time and effort in GStreamer 0.8 (as have we), but I don't understand
why you're actively resisting a move forward.
Thomas
Dave/Dina : future TV today ! - http://www.davedina.org/
<-*- thomas (dot) apestaart (dot) org -*->
Goodbye
I've finally arrived
<-*- thomas (at) apestaart (dot) org -*->
URGent, best radio on the net - 24/7 ! - http://urgent.fm/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]